Comments on: I am a terrorist

By: Antonio

Antonio — Sat, 05 Sep 2009 03:29:51 +0000

well that would require a new generation of children that can be taught that power leads to corruption. Yet in our society, it is so obvious that there are those that consider themselves above the rest of us. I think in this paradoxial way, many people search for power all of their life, caused by their powerlessness.

I do want to apologize since there is a big difference between chaos and a no class system. Are you aware though that anarchy is being hijacked by the federal government to cause damage during peaceful protests.

you can youtube the seatle protests of 99.

By: Mike Gogulski

Mike Gogulski — Fri, 04 Sep 2009 09:26:27 +0000

Well there is one rule for anarchy: Nobody rules.

By: Antonio

Antonio — Fri, 04 Sep 2009 03:20:14 +0000

yea, you know, I didnt see it that way. Why cant we have anarchy with a very select few rules, you know, set in stone. What do you think mike?

By: b-psycho

b-psycho — Fri, 28 Aug 2009 17:58:23 +0000

Isn’t it funny how the same people that say anarchy requires unrealistic faith in society always work in a “well then I can shoot you and you can’t do anything about it!” line, without realizing that claiming such power is what defines a state?

By: Antonio

Antonio — Fri, 28 Aug 2009 00:40:54 +0000

cheers!!!

By: Mike Gogulski

Mike Gogulski — Thu, 27 Aug 2009 21:35:02 +0000

Ah, thanks for pointing that out, I’ve never heard it before. I guess I’ll just delete my website then, and maybe try to get my citizenship back so that I can start voting. Cheers!

By: Antonio

Antonio — Thu, 27 Aug 2009 18:29:10 +0000

well then i suppose that you would have 6 billion people in a lawless society. so basically I have the right to shoot you if you piss me off and you have the right to die.

Its nice that you have so much faith in society. but anarchy is basically just that: chaos.

By: Mike Gogulski

Mike Gogulski — Thu, 27 Aug 2009 09:16:58 +0000

What bothers me is the unproven, fallacious statement right up front, that “government is essential”.

By: Antonio

Antonio — Thu, 27 Aug 2009 04:21:44 +0000

I think we see eye to eye on many issues that are proving detrimental to our freedom in the future. Government is a result of the evolution of our societies, and therefore essential. The world government may very well be planning to de-populize the Earth.

think of this: it is a matter of simple arithmetic to arive at the conclusion that by 2400, the world would be populated to the extent that every person would occupy a square meter.

you may be anti-government, but the government may be pro-Earth. there is little that can be done about overpopulation, except of course, living on mars.

the battle of our time may not be about our liberties of the future, but our very freedom to live on the planet. one of the reasons that our population is dumbed down, is to justify the arguement that our life(common- people) is not worth living.

you better have a lot of guns, because you may be up against:
the army (s)
the media
brainwashed population

my question to you is:

What is it that bothers you more, depopulation may be neccesary. or Is it that its being decided that your life is not worth living.

By: Mike Gogulski

Mike Gogulski — Fri, 12 Jun 2009 22:02:40 +0000

@Ashley: No, it’s not satirical. Unfortunately.