Comments on: I am a terrorist

By: Doug Barbieri

Doug Barbieri — Fri, 08 Jul 2011 07:30:46 +0000

Martin: I have never thought of it this way! Overpopulation conditions being simulated by the state’s mismanagement of resources! Thanks for that well written post!

“Governments and other organizations are NOT corrupted by power.” Other organizations being…say, the mafia?

They are not corrupted by power because they ARE corrupt.

By: magiclife

magiclife — Wed, 28 Jul 2010 12:30:36 +0000

Governments and other organizations are NOT corrupted by power. They are corrupted by certain individuals who seek power within those entities. If you eliminate those people from membership, you would have no problems, except from the government who would say you are discriminating. Anti-discrimination laws make it possible for minions to infiltrate and destroy the fiber of any organization. Those laws are also the same as anti-murder laws. If a person or persons consistently threaten me and my people with imposing their way of life and beliefs, laws and propaganda have made it a “crime” to do the right thing. So called indigenous peoples have been seen as criminals for protecting their families land and cultures with so called violent acts. This is a deep spread belief. You realize when you watch James Bond and root for him, you are rooting for evil to prevail in the world. He is a representative minion of the most murderous plunderers the world has known. Watch a Brit film where some Brit shoots some Ethiopian sniper and everyone breathes a sigh of relief because the Brits will not be shot at any more. BUT they should be shot at in Ethiopia. They have no right to make violent acts on those people…yet that is what they did. So, what do you believe?

By: Martin Fick

Martin Fick — Wed, 07 Jul 2010 21:53:16 +0000

@Antonio: Simple arithmetic applied incorrectly to any problem can incorrectly prove anything. Ask yourself why this same arithmetic applied to every other species of animal or plant has not come to fruition? Humans are not immune to nature’s laws. Like any other species, we can only grow as a population to the size that our resources permit. We expand our population when our resources expand. If our resources can expand infinitely (not likely), than we will likely expand infinitely. But either way, there can never be long term over population.

Over population is short term problem only since it is by definition not sustainable (or else it would not be over population). And, naturally, the problems with short term population are the resource management problems. The better resources are managed, the less painful it will be, and the shorter the time span this temporary over population will take. Either way, it cannot last long, not ever more than a generation (true overpopulation causes death and prevents births). So no need to look way ahead to the future to predict eminent doom.

Do not make the fallacy of thinking that humans have only reached the current population because of exponential growth over time. Yes, our growth is exponential, but only during its growth! Our growth is stunted constantly, during these time periods our growth may even be negative (when we experience short term overpopulation). It is evolution and more recently innovation that enables our expansion to be exponential at times because we increase the resources available to our species.

Of course, it is possible to have conditions that are similar to over population for many people, and for this to continue for a long period of time because of irrational mismanagement of resources. When the state takes from those who manage their resources well enough to give to those who don’t, it encourages breeding and consumption beyond the level of sustainability of the people who mismanage resources. This makes it seem like there is overpopulation to many since the state will constantly be interfering to support this model.

By: Antonio

Antonio — Sat, 05 Sep 2009 03:29:51 +0000

well that would require a new generation of children that can be taught that power leads to corruption. Yet in our society, it is so obvious that there are those that consider themselves above the rest of us. I think in this paradoxial way, many people search for power all of their life, caused by their powerlessness.

I do want to apologize since there is a big difference between chaos and a no class system. Are you aware though that anarchy is being hijacked by the federal government to cause damage during peaceful protests.

you can youtube the seatle protests of 99.

By: Mike Gogulski

Mike Gogulski — Fri, 04 Sep 2009 09:26:27 +0000

Well there is one rule for anarchy: Nobody rules.

By: Antonio

Antonio — Fri, 04 Sep 2009 03:20:14 +0000

yea, you know, I didnt see it that way. Why cant we have anarchy with a very select few rules, you know, set in stone. What do you think mike?

By: b-psycho

b-psycho — Fri, 28 Aug 2009 17:58:23 +0000

Isn’t it funny how the same people that say anarchy requires unrealistic faith in society always work in a “well then I can shoot you and you can’t do anything about it!” line, without realizing that claiming such power is what defines a state?

By: Antonio

Antonio — Fri, 28 Aug 2009 00:40:54 +0000

cheers!!!

By: Mike Gogulski

Mike Gogulski — Thu, 27 Aug 2009 21:35:02 +0000

Ah, thanks for pointing that out, I’ve never heard it before. I guess I’ll just delete my website then, and maybe try to get my citizenship back so that I can start voting. Cheers!

By: Antonio

Antonio — Thu, 27 Aug 2009 18:29:10 +0000

well then i suppose that you would have 6 billion people in a lawless society. so basically I have the right to shoot you if you piss me off and you have the right to die.

Its nice that you have so much faith in society. but anarchy is basically just that: chaos.