<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Confrontation with bureaucracy, part 3</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nostate.com/1201/confrontation-with-bureaucracy-part-3/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nostate.com/1201/confrontation-with-bureaucracy-part-3/</link>
	<description>ACCESS ALL AREAS</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 04:00:16 +0200</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Steve Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.nostate.com/1201/confrontation-with-bureaucracy-part-3/comment-page-1/#comment-3673</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 08:34:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nostate.com/?p=1201#comment-3673</guid>
		<description>So that means a Form 8854 does not have to be filed?

If is isn&#039;t, then 877A is applicable, which does not mean anything unless one has net assets over $600,000.

Is that correct?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->So that means a Form 8854 does not have to be filed?</p>
<p>If is isn&#8217;t, then 877A is applicable, which does not mean anything unless one has net assets over $600,000.</p>
<p>Is that correct?<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AJ Valleron</title>
		<link>http://www.nostate.com/1201/confrontation-with-bureaucracy-part-3/comment-page-1/#comment-3347</link>
		<dc:creator>AJ Valleron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 22:06:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nostate.com/?p=1201#comment-3347</guid>
		<description>OK, if you ticked No, then you&#039;re in 877A (the Exit Tax). That won&#039;t mean anything unless you have large unrealised gains (over US$600,000). If you don&#039;t have that, it won&#039;t make any difference.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->OK, if you ticked No, then you&#8217;re in 877A (the Exit Tax). That won&#8217;t mean anything unless you have large unrealised gains (over US$600,000). If you don&#8217;t have that, it won&#8217;t make any difference.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Gogulski</title>
		<link>http://www.nostate.com/1201/confrontation-with-bureaucracy-part-3/comment-page-1/#comment-3332</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Gogulski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 22:44:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nostate.com/?p=1201#comment-3332</guid>
		<description>Note the possible exception, though. I checked &quot;no&quot; on a question of the form &quot;do you swear you&#039;ve complied with all your US tax obligations for the past five years&quot;. There was a notation saying that unless that response was &quot;yes&quot;, I fall under 877.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Note the possible exception, though. I checked &#8220;no&#8221; on a question of the form &#8220;do you swear you&#8217;ve complied with all your US tax obligations for the past five years&#8221;. There was a notation saying that unless that response was &#8220;yes&#8221;, I fall under 877.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AJ Valleron</title>
		<link>http://www.nostate.com/1201/confrontation-with-bureaucracy-part-3/comment-page-1/#comment-3331</link>
		<dc:creator>AJ Valleron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 22:42:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nostate.com/?p=1201#comment-3331</guid>
		<description>Actually, the new law of 877A is better if you don&#039;t want to file the Form 8854. Your US tax obligation ended when you signed the Oath of Renunication. This was your last day as a &quot;US Person&quot; (US tax resident). 

Under the old 877 rules, if you DIDN&#039;T file the 8854 your US taxation would continue to run forever. No matter for you of course because these rules don&#039;t apply.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Actually, the new law of 877A is better if you don&#8217;t want to file the Form 8854. Your US tax obligation ended when you signed the Oath of Renunication. This was your last day as a &#8220;US Person&#8221; (US tax resident). </p>
<p>Under the old 877 rules, if you DIDN&#8217;T file the 8854 your US taxation would continue to run forever. No matter for you of course because these rules don&#8217;t apply.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Gogulski</title>
		<link>http://www.nostate.com/1201/confrontation-with-bureaucracy-part-3/comment-page-1/#comment-3330</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Gogulski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 22:21:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nostate.com/?p=1201#comment-3330</guid>
		<description>@AJ: Aha. Didn&#039;t read it that way. Well, we&#039;ll see in any case, because there&#039;s approximately zero chance of my filing the bloody thing anyway. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->@AJ: Aha. Didn&#8217;t read it that way. Well, we&#8217;ll see in any case, because there&#8217;s approximately zero chance of my filing the bloody thing anyway. <img src='http://www.nostate.com/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> <!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AJ Valleron</title>
		<link>http://www.nostate.com/1201/confrontation-with-bureaucracy-part-3/comment-page-1/#comment-3329</link>
		<dc:creator>AJ Valleron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 22:19:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nostate.com/?p=1201#comment-3329</guid>
		<description>Mike, you don&#039;t have to file the Form 8854 for ten years. By the sounds of it, you expatriated after June 2008 and therefore only owe the IRS one 8854 (the first and the last). The ten-year shadow period is not applicable to you (section 877). Because you expatriated later than June 2008, you are subject to Section 877A. Even if 877 applied to you, your net assets must be over US$2m to have to file the Form 8854 for ten years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Mike, you don&#8217;t have to file the Form 8854 for ten years. By the sounds of it, you expatriated after June 2008 and therefore only owe the IRS one 8854 (the first and the last). The ten-year shadow period is not applicable to you (section 877). Because you expatriated later than June 2008, you are subject to Section 877A. Even if 877 applied to you, your net assets must be over US$2m to have to file the Form 8854 for ten years.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Name1</title>
		<link>http://www.nostate.com/1201/confrontation-with-bureaucracy-part-3/comment-page-1/#comment-2631</link>
		<dc:creator>Name1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2009 23:27:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nostate.com/?p=1201#comment-2631</guid>
		<description>Maybe write an article or link to here if you have time:

http://www.escapefromamerica.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Maybe write an article or link to here if you have time:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.escapefromamerica.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.escapefromamerica.com</a><!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Name1</title>
		<link>http://www.nostate.com/1201/confrontation-with-bureaucracy-part-3/comment-page-1/#comment-2630</link>
		<dc:creator>Name1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2009 22:53:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nostate.com/?p=1201#comment-2630</guid>
		<description>Did you receive any type of confirmation your Form 8854 was received and processed, ending your tax status?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Did you receive any type of confirmation your Form 8854 was received and processed, ending your tax status?<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Gogulski</title>
		<link>http://www.nostate.com/1201/confrontation-with-bureaucracy-part-3/comment-page-1/#comment-1478</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Gogulski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 16:06:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nostate.com/?p=1201#comment-1478</guid>
		<description>@Kent: The possibility exists, however remote, that I might be found deportable under Slovak law. The target country for that deportation would be the US. Not a desirable outcome at this point.

@Peter: No, you heard him exactly right. The US is one of a vanishingly small number of nations (two?) which require citizens living abroad to file tax returns every year, and pay income tax if certain income thresholds are exceeded. Last I looked, you could earn up to around US$80,000 outside the US while on non-resident status, and have that amount exempt from taxation. Filing tax returns is still mandatory regardless. &quot;Failure due to reasonable cause&quot; might mean something like the taxpayer died, went insane, was imprisoned incommunicado, and so forth.

@Matt: The Embassy&#039;s duties do not encompass providing tax advice, of course, so no, they didn&#039;t explain it. What can they do? Dunno... arrest me at the port of entry on an outstanding warrant should I ever turn up on US soil? Black bag job? Let your imagination roam...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->@Kent: The possibility exists, however remote, that I might be found deportable under Slovak law. The target country for that deportation would be the US. Not a desirable outcome at this point.</p>
<p>@Peter: No, you heard him exactly right. The US is one of a vanishingly small number of nations (two?) which require citizens living abroad to file tax returns every year, and pay income tax if certain income thresholds are exceeded. Last I looked, you could earn up to around US$80,000 outside the US while on non-resident status, and have that amount exempt from taxation. Filing tax returns is still mandatory regardless. &#8220;Failure due to reasonable cause&#8221; might mean something like the taxpayer died, went insane, was imprisoned incommunicado, and so forth.</p>
<p>@Matt: The Embassy&#8217;s duties do not encompass providing tax advice, of course, so no, they didn&#8217;t explain it. What can they do? Dunno&#8230; arrest me at the port of entry on an outstanding warrant should I ever turn up on US soil? Black bag job? Let your imagination roam&#8230;<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mattocracy</title>
		<link>http://www.nostate.com/1201/confrontation-with-bureaucracy-part-3/comment-page-1/#comment-1475</link>
		<dc:creator>Mattocracy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 01:44:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nostate.com/?p=1201#comment-1475</guid>
		<description>Divorces are expensive and it sounds like this bitch can take you to the cleaners for leaving her.  They purposely made this scary catch 22 for a reason.  You owe taxes, yet you aren&#039;t a citizens, so technically you aren&#039;t guaranteed the same rights.  If you don&#039;t comply for the next ten years, what can they do?  Did they explain that at all?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Divorces are expensive and it sounds like this bitch can take you to the cleaners for leaving her.  They purposely made this scary catch 22 for a reason.  You owe taxes, yet you aren&#8217;t a citizens, so technically you aren&#8217;t guaranteed the same rights.  If you don&#8217;t comply for the next ten years, what can they do?  Did they explain that at all?<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
