Renouncing privilege and fake solidarity: 595-12-5274
9 May 2009 by Mike GogulskiPosted in crime, diary | 17 Comments »
About a week ago I scanned my US Social Security card and published the images online, inviting readers to “steal” the number — as if numbers could really be owned, anyway.
In that posting I didn’t really give any reasons for doing it. Some looked at it as an act of pure anarchy, others looked at it as sheer insanity, and I was even accused of “aiding and abetting” “illegal” “aliens” who might use the number in the United States.
Now I’ll tell y’all why I done did it.
First of all, I’m going to burn the card later this year. That event is postponed until I, card and fire are in front of a camera suitable for making YouTube videos. So you can consider the posting just a teaser for the main event.

A token of fake solidarity -- yours for the taking
Second, and more importantly, I have resolved that I will never accept payments from Social Security, or any other state pension scheme.
Now, maybe you’re saying, “Eh, you’re not even a citizen any more anyway, so you lost that!” Not true. Citizenship has no bearing on “benefits” eligibility.
Or, you might be saying, “But you could at least take back what was stolen from you in taxes!” Not true either.
Given how Social Security is structured, what was stolen from me in taxes will always be stolen. It cannot reasonably be reclaimed, since it’s already been redistributed to millions of other people. Despite the fact that many Americans receive regular Social Security “statements” which twist language to make it appear that contributors have “invested” something, there is no investment. There are only ledger entries made, accruing future privileges to be delivered via robbing future workers.
The money that was taken from me in Social Security taxes between 1987 and 2003 is effectively gone. I cannot justify taking a Social Security pension twenty years from now in order to reclaim those funds, because to do so would be to support a system that will steal anew from other people in order to pay me. The notion of rightly getting back what you put into such a program is fallacious.
A Social Security pension — or any other state-funded pension program of the type — is a product of legal privilege. If I were to go out and rob a few million peaceful people in order to fund my retirement, civil society would rightly call me a criminal. The machinery of the state — or, even, a free people — would descend upon me to stop my crime, punish me, and perhaps attempt to make restitution to the victims.
When the state goes out and robs millions in order to fund people’s retirement pensions, the robbery is sanctified. It’s called “solidarity” or “the social contract” or other similar nonsense.
Marxists sometimes criticize what they call “capitalism” for “atomizing” society, for driving divisions between people and breaking the bonds of true solidarity which hold communities and societies together. But what could be more atomizing than a state pension system that says, “submit to robbery while you are young, so that you can enjoy the privilege of benefiting from robbery when you are old”?
No thanks. I’d prefer real solidarity. And given the choice between fake solidarity which supports the state’s privileged robbery and the real solidarity which must be expressed by each individual volunteering to support those worse off, I’ll choose the latter. Even if doing so means living in poverty at the end of my days.
Anyone who wants to fund my retirement — or, during this crisis, my living expenses — is warmly invited to do so by clicking “Support nostate.com” above. Real solidarity is welcome. I won’t have any of the fake.




17 Responses to “Renouncing privilege and fake solidarity: 595-12-5274”
By Leo T. Magnificent on 9 May 2009
Well, unlike a lot of lazy people on the interwebz, I actually did a little investigation and reach that conclusion by logic my friend
- that being that you have no form of citizenship. I have to admit, that you have “balls;” for it seems that you are one of the few people of action, in a world of, “library libs,” and, “arcade anarchs.” Keep up the good work my market comrade! ;D
-Lassiez Faire!
By Mike Gogulski on 9 May 2009
Thanks, Leo, but which conclusion, specifically?
By Leo T. Magnificent on 9 May 2009
“- that being that you have no form of citizenship.”
Yeah, sorry if I wasn’t specific enough, my bad.
By DixieFlatline on 10 May 2009
I’ve come to the same conclusion Mike.
Still working towards re-orienting my life, but last year I turned down 50 weeks of paid employment welfare, and have never felt better about myself. There is no way I will claim a state pension, and have already allowed my state health insurance documentation to lapse.
I’m seriously debating letting my driver’s license as well.
I wonder if I can renounce my SIN (Social Insurance Number) if I have no intention of claiming… hmmm….
By Mike Gogulski on 10 May 2009
@Dixie: As I wrote in a new post:
Though I am doing some perhaps bold things on the intertubes these days, I am really doing so yet only in spaces where I feel relatively safe. In that vein, I would like to be as bold as possible. I would also like to avoid prison and the gallows in the process. I have bowed to authority in becoming re-documented; not because I think that is necessary, but because the “stateless person’s travel document” functions as a talisman to ward off cops who might otherwise jail me.
I’d suggest keeping your driver’s license, for defensive purposes, and in the recognition that it doesn’t represent privilege — rather, it functions in limited circumstances as garlic does to vampires.
By Brice on 23 May 2009
Dead fucking on.
I’ll choose reality anytime.
By Jack on 25 May 2009
Yeah, you’re not an anarchist, capitalism cannot be anarchist.
Go fuck yourself.
By Mike Gogulski on 25 May 2009
Jack, that makes about as much sense as saying white men can’t love cheese. Go and expropriate someone’s toothbrush — elsewhere.
By Luke7777777 on 1 June 2009
Hi, Mike. I translated your text into Polish and put it here:
http://luke7777777.blogspot.com/2009/06/tumaczenie-mike-gogulski-wyrzekam-sie.html
_______
Luke7777777.blogspot.com
http://luke7777777.blogspot.com/
CATHOLICISM > LIBERTARIANISM > INFOANARCHY
LuckyLuke7777777.blogspot.com
http://luckyluke7777777.blogspot.com/
CULTURE, MEDIA & STUFF
By Mike Gogulski on 2 June 2009
Luke: You rock! I am once again honored.
By Elise on 20 June 2009
I am interested in more detail on how you define the difference between asking for donations and being a part of social security.
By Mike Gogulski on 20 June 2009
Elise: A donation is a voluntary act. Social Security is a tax, tax is theft, and the penalty is death. See the difference?
By ANonEMoose on 25 June 2009
“But what could be more atomizing than a state pension system that says, “submit to robbery while you are young, so that you can enjoy the privilege of benefiting from robbery when you are old”?
No thanks.”
I’d prefer plain, old-fashioned robbery ;D.
By Czar on 12 July 2009
Interesting post, but isn’t tax payments some kind of SAVING for your old days? I’d like to read your point on that… You pay, you save, then you are supposed to get a retribution, ain’t it?
By Mike Gogulski on 12 July 2009
@Czar: There is no savings, there is no investment. The money you pay in today (which is stolen, via tax) is immediately given to others (redistributed).
By Demetrius Martinez on 10 December 2009
Social Security is the mother of all Ponzi schemes.
Furthermore, the notion that it is (or was initially sold) to be some “insurance plan” is a blatant lie.
Good stand Mike!