Comments on: Taking sides on the right to be a complete jackass

By: blanconnier

blanconnier — Mon, 22 Jun 2009 12:02:00 +0000

He is an assassin who killed his other soldiers and people without caring. He is a false anarchist who thinks that anarcists are always to be obsessed with watching stock market. He was even in the finance industry, sohe can not be anarch.

He kills people to make money and he think that to do so is good.

By: On rejecting Keith Preston | No Treason

On rejecting Keith Preston | No Treason — Sun, 21 Jun 2009 10:10:14 +0000

[...] RadGeek in response to another commenter at NoState; I dunno, dude, when someone starts complaining about “cock-ringed queers,” “bearded ladies,” “pissed-off, man-hating, dykes with an excess of body hair,” and “persons of one or another surgically altered ‘gender identity,’” quote-unquote, and states, without any qualification, that fewer such people ought to be “in our midst,” in order to make the kind of person he thinks of as the “average young rebel” (who, we can glean from the textual evidence, is supposed to be white, male, straight, and not an immigrant) more comfortable joining up — well, I get the impression that he does care, and moreover that he expects other people to care. Not so much about the fact of sexuality per se, but more about how far one is open about sex and gender in a way that makes things uncomfortable for those who believe in a very rigid set of gender norms. [...]

By: How to Convert a Big Tent Into a Small One | Austro-Athenian Empire

How to Convert a Big Tent Into a Small One | Austro-Athenian Empire — Thu, 11 Jun 2009 13:42:05 +0000

[...] flurry of hasta la vistas from the left-libertarian blogosphere (see Kevin Carson, Royce Christian, Mike Gogulski, Charles Johnson, Brad Spangler, Darian Worden, the ALL Forums, and now me with a belated ditto [...]

By: Mike Gogulski

Mike Gogulski — Sun, 31 May 2009 20:26:03 +0000

@blanconnier: spill the beans, let the cat outta the bag here? You know how we all love these internecine conflicts. More drama!!!

By: blanconnier

blanconnier — Sun, 31 May 2009 20:24:27 +0000

Hi there

Geoffrey Transom is a complete conman.
If you want to know who is REALLY Transom, let me know.

By: Attack the System » Blog Archive » The “Purge” Revisted: Anarcho-Leftoids Unite in Hatred Against Keith Preston

Thu, 28 May 2009 00:51:56 +0000

[...] the ball rolling in the flood of responses to my “sodomy” piece, and I’ve already posted a response on the No State blog. I want to follow up by addressing Golguski’s final sentence: “Without [...]

By: Jeremy

Jeremy — Wed, 27 May 2009 15:45:54 +0000

I predict that at some point in the future there will be a major split on the Left between the egalitarian-humanist-universalist wing and the radical post-modernist/radical multicultural/cultural relativist/overtly Third Worldist wing, as these two are obviously incompatible with one another.

– Keith Preston

By: Aster

Aster — Tue, 26 May 2009 22:29:09 +0000

Jeremy-

Thank you for your willingness to put these issues to serious thought. I hope you will excuse me if I now take my leave of this conversation.

By: Aster

Aster — Tue, 26 May 2009 22:22:34 +0000

I believe with, Rand, that those subtle differences of philosophy are the essential issues behind all politics; the issue of what kind of universe we are living in, what kind of beings we are, and what we ought to do with ourselves, show their manifestations as the political issues we make strife over. First principles matter.

By: Jeremy

Jeremy — Tue, 26 May 2009 18:59:58 +0000

I left that mention of Stirner’s masterpiece hanging without explanation. It’s funny that, though Preston and I are pretty different kinds of people, and we have TOTALLY different views on human nature and the meaning of life and all that noise, we find ourselves on similar sides of these debates. I long since abandoned any concern about whether people think I’m an anarcho-fascist or not, but it is interesting how we segregate ourselves into dueling sides based, ultimately, on extremely subtle differences on philosophy and not on actual political positions. I have much reflection to do on this.