Comments on: National Science Foundation causing online porn shortage!

By: Stirner

Stirner — Fri, 02 Oct 2009 08:06:10 +0000

bureaucrats get off my la … porn!!

On the other hand, they create demand and save some jobs with this.

By: Winterset

Winterset — Thu, 01 Oct 2009 13:37:47 +0000

Ah yes! The National Science Foundation Workers (NSFW). All acronyms have double meanings and now we know this one!

By: Gilligan

Gilligan — Thu, 01 Oct 2009 11:32:18 +0000

What kind of porn did he take? Think on this…you just may not want him to give it back.

You might want to give him a “public service” medal for keeping the intertubes clean by removing images of people 5 foot square, the front row of a nude bingo hall, etc, etc . Hopefully, he took all of the hi-def porn…Ewwwhhh.

By: Mike Gogulski

Mike Gogulski — Thu, 01 Oct 2009 03:52:01 +0000

Oh gawd, don’t say “package” that way…

By: MerryMonk

MerryMonk — Thu, 01 Oct 2009 03:11:04 +0000

I am happy to see that the stimulus package is stimulating someone. Amazingly enough, in a recession even the bureaucrats work harder.

By: Rorshak (1313)

Rorshak (1313) — Thu, 01 Oct 2009 00:10:51 +0000

That’s something else we need to do to prepare for when the shit hits the fan. Download as much porn as possible!

By: Mike Gogulski

Mike Gogulski — Wed, 30 Sep 2009 17:42:26 +0000

I don’t know, it isn’t clear what the sixfold increase was measured against, even. Was it 331 days of porn in a single year? If so, that guy really needs a holiday!

In any case, that’s a whole lot of porn that’s been taken, and which should be given back.

By: The New Anarchist

The New Anarchist — Wed, 30 Sep 2009 17:39:51 +0000

Oh, man. I thought I had written a good post and then I saw SCIENCE MAN PORN!

331 days? Is that accumulated hours or just daily access? Cause if it’s the former, hoo-ah.