ACCESS ALL AREAS

Post-agorism? — A dialogue

Sunday, 10 May 2009 by Mike Gogulski
diary | 3 Comments »

Reaction and discussion on Black Bloke's Facebook posting of an antiwar.com article, "Jon Stewart: Wimp, Wuss, Moral Coward by Justin Raimondo" leads to Anna O Morgenstern saying: Anna: Killing a mafia boss's family to get him to surrender is still murder. Mike: Assuming their ...

The State in the Mind

Friday, 6 February 2009 by Mike Gogulski
mind control, philosophy | 4 Comments »

The State has guns and men to use them. [...][H]owever, it not only can fail to coerce a rebellious majority, it cannot even stop an enterprising minority of black marketeers and other Counter-Economists. The State must be defeated in each ...

Agorism’s axioms, per SEK3

Thursday, 29 January 2009 by Mike Gogulski
philosophy | 2 Comments »

The closest approach to a free society is an uncorrupted agora (open marketplace). The agora self-corrects for small perturbations of corruption. The moral system of any agora is compatible with pure libertarianism. Agora in part is agora in whole; to a workable approximation, ...

The overlooked counter-economic component

Wednesday, 14 January 2009 by Mike Gogulski
activism, economics | 12 Comments »

From page 54 of the newly-minted ALLiance: a journal of theory and strategy, in Samuel Edward Konkin III's "The Last, Whole Introduction to Agorism", 1995: [caption id="attachment_1455" align="alignleft" width="443" caption="An image of a portion of a screenshot of the article in ...

Konkin on voting

Saturday, 13 December 2008 by Mike Gogulski
philosophy, politics | Comments Off on Konkin on voting

[I]t is immoral to support politicians to oppress us because they might relieve one oppression. -- Samuel Edward Konkin III, "Reply to Rothbard", Strategy of the New Libertarian Alliance, Number One, May Day 1981, 11-19
  • Categories

  • Archives

  • Core Dogma